Skip to content

Conversation

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This reverts commit 8ce7962. There's variable name conflicts with 8aebc80#diff-39298b470865a4cbc67398a4ea11e767.

This can be cleanly ported back to branch-3.0.

Why are the changes needed?

Performance investigation were not made enough and it's not clear if it really beneficial or now.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Jenkins tests.

@SparkQA

This comment has been minimized.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 10, 2020

Test build #118125 has finished for PR 27514 at commit f1d8157.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 10, 2020

Test build #118133 has finished for PR 27514 at commit f1d8157.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 10, 2020

Test build #118161 has finished for PR 27514 at commit f1d8157.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 10, 2020

Test build #118162 has finished for PR 27514 at commit f1d8157.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Merged to master.

HyukjinKwon added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2020
…is not static"

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This reverts commit 8ce7962. There's variable name conflicts with 8aebc80#diff-39298b470865a4cbc67398a4ea11e767.

This can be cleanly ported back to branch-3.0.

### Why are the changes needed?
Performance investigation were not made enough and it's not clear if it really beneficial or now.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.

Closes #27514 from HyukjinKwon/revert-cache-PR.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <[email protected]>
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

and merged to branch-3.0.

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon deleted the revert-cache-PR branch March 3, 2020 01:16
sjincho pushed a commit to sjincho/spark that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
…is not static"

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This reverts commit 8ce7962. There's variable name conflicts with apache@8aebc80#diff-39298b470865a4cbc67398a4ea11e767.

This can be cleanly ported back to branch-3.0.

### Why are the changes needed?
Performance investigation were not made enough and it's not clear if it really beneficial or now.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.

Closes apache#27514 from HyukjinKwon/revert-cache-PR.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Li <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants